Ghana: Religious Wonderland

“Thoughts and observations on Ghana’s religious equilibrium.”

A while back I had the chance to visit the beautiful West African country of Ghana. Independent since 1952 it was the first colony to shake off Great Britain’s imperial rule. Who closely followed the World Championship might have noticed that the “Black Stars” (Ghanas national football team; have a look on the Ghana’s flag if you like to know where the names comes from) are praying a lot. If would have been to Ghana during the Championship you would have noticed that regularly radio show hosts called on their listeners to pray for the victory of their team. You would have further noticed that this call was not directed on one special religious group but asked Muslims and Christians and other orientations alike. Does this tell us something about the country as a whole? Well in a time when religion- and especially Islam- is highly politicized Ghana is an refreshing counterexample. While in New York there is much discussion whether a Mosque can be opened near Ground Zero, a right wing party in the Netherlands can end up third in national elections with the single issue Islam, Switzerland bans Minarets and two of the most read German authors when it comes the the question of how Islam is going to fit in the societies of the west are Udo Ulfkotte and Hendryk M. Broder you can not evade to ask why? Does religion have to be so totally shape the mindsets of political thinking? Especially Islam has a hard time to be treated with dignity. Personally I admire Fareed Zakaria when he gives back his price to the Anti Defamation League (ADL). By their statements the ADL has done the job of those that link it to right wing Israeli politicians and do not believe in it non- partisan stand that is supposed to protect all minorities from defamation (The Central Council of the Jews [in Germany] is doing a much better job when siding with the Muslim community on a regular basis). The west has a severe problem to live up to its own principles when it comes to Islam and that is sad.

When you travel in Ghana you will find very different circumstance that might be surprising especially when you know that neighboring countries with similar religious settings face sever problems (think: Ivory Coast). As in other countries in West Africa Ghana is divided in a predominantly Islamic north and and a south (coast line) that is dominated by Christians. In both parts of the country you can find big populations of the respective other. The “Clash of Civilizations” post- 9/11 etc. mindset makes us expect a country that has harsh problems with religions that compete with each other and riots occurring all the time. We expect young radicals bombing girl schools, militias routing villages that are inhibited by the other religious group and all kinds of inter- religious clashes maybe even a civil war that divides the country along religious lines. You will find nothing like that.

Why is that so? What does religion look like in Ghana? If you arrive in Accra you will immediately notice the vast numbers of Neo- Christian churches all over town. You will also learn about the habit to give shops and companies strange sounding names like: “Jesus the Name of the Lord Building Materials”. Christianity in Ghana is overall extremely pluralistic and the choice of your believe and the kind of believe is predominantly seen as personal business and choice. In the northern town of Tamale you will not only find a methodist and baptist church but also a catholic cathedral. The towns center is dominated by a big Mosque but still you will not hear of any inter- religious problems.

When you speak to the people in the country you will stumble over opinions that do not remotely fit into the normal perceptions of religious people and the neo- medieval perception of Islam. Not only that woman of course have to work and that people accept that western tourists dress strange, the woman/man you are going to marry does not even have to be a Muslim/ Christian herself, because “the religion does not command that”. A lot of people do not even distinguish between Islam and Christianity which they consider pretty much the same. They describe themselves as “religious”. The anti- conservatism goes even further: Muslim here do not necessarily distinguish between Suna and Shia. Somehow this country is the religious winter wonderland.

So is Islam only acceptable when it is deprived of defining elements? Well not at all but is makes you wonder why neither Christians nor Muslims claim universal righteousness. Religious peace within a totally religious environment: fascinating. But still the shock waves of international politics can be sensed in Ghana as well. The Islam is Northern Ghana might change. There is tension between the practiced religion of the people and the teachings of some Mullahs. The influence of the Saudi financed Wahhabism might be present as well. Some of the Mosques financed by Arabian oil money try to shift the religious discourse. And people will tell you that their subjection under religious rules has “purified” over the last ten or so years. Another danger to the equilibrium might arise from the evangelical pastors that are present and nurse more and more followers. What if the turn from peace and love encouraging happy faces to fanatics that more resemble the Pat Robertsons of this world?

Currently you can find kind of a religious wonderland in Ghana but what will happen if this does change? One argumentation why the religious cleavage in other countries in West Africa has been politicized is that religion is only a cover for underlying economic grievances. But a development divide can also be found in Ghana, the north is underdeveloped and falls behind the south economically. The potential for conflict is embedded in the structure of the country. Another argument is build on the notion of traditional African tolerance when it comes to religious issues. At the moment this is what you can observe in Ghana, the question is how long the country will be able to remain uninfluenced by international politics. Until than Ghana might be a very good example how different religions can live together without killing each other and a remarkable instance of the differences within Islam, far away from the presences of a Broder or Bin Laden.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Politik

Side notes on (Islamic) terrorism! (3)

“One of the biggest threats is terrorists will acquire an A-bomb and nuke NY”

The terrorist atomic bomb; assembled in a cave in Pakistan and transported through the whole country were it is put on a cargo ship to New York and exploded there. Yeah sure. I love the story because it is just such a big piece of crap.

There are some countries (sic!) that managed to build a A- bomb and those of North Korea are said to be so big that it will be extremely hard for them to actually deploy them. All of those countries invested billion of Euro into the development and fabrication and Iran still has not achieved the goal although they are desperately trying. Do you really believe that some guys from a village in Waziristan that hardly can read or write will be able to do this? And even if AQ or some other group is able to convince 10 nuclear scientist (that actually have to know what they are doing) to build it for them they still have to bring the pieces together. The right kind of Uranium, special detonators etc. And this without any authority in the world noticing. And than of course you have to deploy the weapon…

The much more probable way for a terrorist group to get hold of a bomb is either to buy or steal it from some corrupt Russian official or to get one from another country. No country in their right mind will give such a weapon to a group that they can not fully control. And than they still have to deploy it.

So called radiological weapons (“dirty- bombs”) have no need for such advanced materials. There are much easier ways to obtain materials that yield low radiation.

On the other hand: they are already overstrained with normal car bombs what makes you think they can do something even more complicated

Read (1) and (2)

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Politik

Side notes on (Islamic) terrorism! (2)

“Islam is a unchangeable static religion with fixed rules that force every Muslim (as least those that take their religion serious) to kill and otherwise harm “non- believers” aka Judaism and Christianity are inherently peaceful”

This is equally nonsense. In fact those who say that take OBL and az- Zawahiri for granted. Islam is a extremely heterogeneous religion with some 5-7 schools of religious law, at least five sects, several local and regional traditions and so on. There are ongoing discussions about who can express funded religious opinion and who is not allowed. Islam is missing a centralized religious authority and even those that exist are always contended. This is often missed because regularly some guy appears in TV and explains what is part of Islam and what is not and what the only right interpretation of Qur’ an Sures are. What you have to notice is that he only speaks for his unique school (and sometimes not even that)!

You can find a whole bunch of secularized Muslims (especially in Switzerland), they just do not appear on TV that often.

If you do not believe me change perspectives. Is Christianity a homogeneous religion? Or even Judaism (there are two big groups of Jews in Switzerland for example. And Orthodox and Liberals have severe problems with each other)? If you have a look on the Bible (even in the New Testament) you will find a lot of stuff that does not fit in todays society and has to be explained away. But be sure you will find some group that sticks to their strict interpretation as well.

Read (1) and (3)

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Politik

Side notes on (Islamic) terrorism! (1)

Since I scan discussions regularly and read way too much on the whole topic there are three arguments that are regularly broad up and deserve a comment.

  1. all terrorism attacks are conducted by Muslims.
  2. Islam is a unchangeable static religion with fixed rules that force every Muslim (as least those that take their religion serious) to kill and otherwise harm “non- believers” aka Judaism and Christianity are inherently peaceful
  3. one of the biggest threats is that terrorist will acquire an A- bomb and nuke New York city.

“All terrorist attacks are conducted by Muslims”

This is just nonsense. If you have a look on terrorism databases that count terrorist attacks you will find that there are a whole bunch of other attacks by secular groups. The different off shots of IRA in Northern Ireland, recent attacks in Greek, uncounted events in South America, India and Nepal. When you have a look on attempted attacks in the USA you learn that just recently authorities prevented an plan to kill police officers on a large scale thought out by a group of fundamentalist Christians (especially the States have their very own tradition of eschatological terrorism). You find similar groups in Israel and White Power radicals in South Africa.

What I am not saying is that there is no problem with Islam inspired terrorism. As a matter of fact there is. But to say that Muslims are the only ones using terrorism as a tool is just wrong.

By the way did you know that until recently most suicide attacks were undertaken by LTTE in Sri Lanka? They are Hindu.

Did you know that the first one to use suicide attacks in the Near East was the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) a secular organization that was founded by a Palestinian Christian.

(2) and (3) follow tomorrow and the day after that

4 Kommentare

Eingeordnet unter Politik

The Minaret Initiative…(again)

…and pollsters were wrong

I have commented on the (Anti-) Minaret initiative earlier but in the meantime some political scientists have taken a look on the event and have tried to explain some of its features.

For those of you who are interested why pollsters were so terrible wrong about the minaret initiative (in all pre-vote surveys the result was that the initiative would be rejected which lead many parties to the conclusion that it was unnecessary to get involved in campaigning) Prof. Hanspeter Kriesi (University of Zurich) offers a surprisingly simple answer.

He argues that highly educated people are overrepresented in the post- vote analysis (and notices that even the results of the post- vote survey do not resemble the real results) and suggests that this might have also influenced the pre- vote surveys since eduction is a significant independent variable that explains rejection of the initiative.

Read the full analysis here.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Politik

What if Berlin was Mumbai?

During some of my recent discussions an interesting and rather disturbing question was brought up.

As we all know in 2008 the Indian city Mumbai was struck by a disastrous terrorist attack.

But what would happen, when such an assault would take place in a large German or European city?  Think about the characteristics of the attack; a heavily armed group, moving and spread over several locations. Indian security were obviously overextended. But how would German police react? We have an example that might illustrate their past performance and help us to form expectation for the future.

Last years Winnenden school shooting is this example. Subsequent to the killings in his old school house 17 year old Tim Kretschmer kidnapped a car driver and later shot himself after two other murders and a shootout with the police. Initially the police had problems determining his location and the number of the attackers. Additionally, SEK (SWAT) was never near the place.

Under even worse conditions it is imaginable that results might have been even more severe.

So the question is: do the big cities such as Hamburg, Berlin and Munich have emergency plans for equal or comparable scenarios? If they do not than there is a necessity for that. Without hysteria but still necessary for the future.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Politik

Reading in Terrorism

Al Qaida has a history.

One of the things that comes up when discussing terrorism and 9/11 is the scapegoat theory. Osama bin Laden is just a scapegoat or even worse; was a tool of the USA to certain groups in the US to accomplish certain foreign policy goals.

This negates the appearance as a group in the 1990s, the halfhearted attempts of the Clinton administration and the reluctance of European governments to act against certain movements while there were several attacks by AQ and its associates.

We know that there were investigations going on in the morning of 9/11 trying to find some of the terrorists that had already boarded to planes.

There is a huge literature by several different scholars and journalists that can be read and uses different sources.

I am aware that this little note will not change your mind if you actually into the 9/11 conspiracy but I urge you to read some of the books that were written by good scholar. Try:

Fawaz A. Gerges: The far enemy: Why Jihad went global

It is sometimes hard to read and there have been complains that it is repetitive but it still offers a sociological explanation why some groups changed their target and went after the far enemy. Especially interesting is to learn about Aiman az-Zawahiris alignment with AQ.

Another interesting book (for those of you who read German) is:

Lars Berger: Die USA und der islamistische Terrorismus

In his reworked Ph.D thesis Berger describes the relation between the USA and Islamic terrorism starting with the attack on the WTC in 1993. It quite comprehensive and includes evaluation of the actors in the USA and the special relation to Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Hinterlasse einen Kommentar

Eingeordnet unter Politik